Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OpenTelemetry instrumentation #59

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

andmat900
Copy link
Contributor

Applicable Issues

Description of the Change

This change adds OpenTelemetry instrumentation to etos-suite-runner.

Alternate Designs

Possible Drawbacks

Sign-off

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matveyeu, [email protected]

@andmat900 andmat900 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2024 12:39
@andmat900 andmat900 requested review from t-persson and fredjn and removed request for a team April 10, 2024 12:39
projects/etos_suite_runner/src/etos_suite_runner/esr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
projects/etos_suite_runner/src/etos_suite_runner/esr.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
span_name = "start_execution_space"
with self.tracer.start_as_current_span(span_name) as span:
span.set_attribute("executor_id", executor["id"])
span.set_attribute("request", dumps(request, indent=4))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is indent=4 necessary? It increases the request size to the open telemetry collector

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is that it isn't readable. At least in Jaeger where it is shown as a simple text blob.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indent argument is now removed.

Comment on lines 104 to 106
# OpenTelemetry context needs to be retrieved here:
# the subsuite is running in a separate process
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment still valid?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment is relevant, I have clarified it in the latest update.

Comment on lines 26 to 36
def get_current_context() -> opentelemetry.context.context.Context:
"""Get current context (propagated via environment variable OTEL_CONTEXT)."""
carrier = {}
LOGGER.info("Current OpenTelemetry context env: %s", os.environ.get("OTEL_CONTEXT"))
for kv in os.environ.get("OTEL_CONTEXT", "").split(","):
if kv:
k, v = kv.split("=", 1)
carrier[k] = v
ctx = opentelemetry.propagate.extract(carrier)
LOGGER.info("Current OpenTelemetry context %s", ctx)
return ctx
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do something similar to this in the ETOS library where we utilize the built-in textmap propagator.
Called here: https://github.com/eiffel-community/etos-library/blob/main/src/etos_lib/eiffel/subscriber.py#L104-L106
Extracted here: https://github.com/eiffel-community/etos-library/blob/main/src/etos_lib/eiffel/subscriber.py#L37-L52

I believe that the one in ETOS library is simpler.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the latest update I have made it more idiomatic. It does not make the code simpler, but it may look better.

Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
timeout = time.time() + self.etos.debug.default_test_result_timeout
try:
while time.time() < timeout:
time.sleep(10)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't doing mandatory sleeping 10 a bit suboptimal? Couldn't we just have shorter sleep inside the 'not self.started'-loop?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd avoid changing it here. This is old code, I just had to change the indent due to opentelemetry span recording.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That sleep is there so that we do not spam the event repository too much. It is needed for both the if not self.started and further down if self.finished is False.
This loop is for waiting for the test runner to start and then to finish.

@andmat900 andmat900 force-pushed the 20240402_opentelemetry branch 4 times, most recently from f9fd9aa to 84f150b Compare April 26, 2024 10:44
@andmat900 andmat900 requested a review from fredjn May 3, 2024 09:27
@andmat900 andmat900 merged commit 9cd62cc into eiffel-community:main May 7, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants